# Open questions The genuinely open, thinking-worthy problems — nothing here is resolved. Analyses and settled facts live in the device docs; each entry points at the doc that holds its detail. Read `state.md` first for placement context. ## 1. Can ConnectX-5 MCIA reach the BCM? (decide on arrival) The decisive unknown for product diagnostics coverage ([nics/connectx-5/](nics/connectx-5/README.md)): - Does firmware MCIA accept **arbitrary I2C device addresses**? The register format allows it (8-bit field, per-access status — verified in `mlx5_ifc.h`); firmware acceptance is the unknown. The module side is settled: the BCM bridge tolerates MCIA's offset-write-then-read framing, proven on hardware ([nics/connectx-5/](nics/connectx-5/README.md)). - Does MCIA emit **one offset byte per write** (which would let SMI command frames be synthesized exactly), and STOP-separated or repeated-START reads? - If firmware says no: product diagnostics via the Marvell/Aquantia modules only. ## 2. ECD run disturbance The BCM ECD run blips the link (PMA 1.1 latch-low catches a drop even with the break-link bit clear). Until the disturbance is characterized, length measurement is a between-runs operation, not a during-run one ([modules/fs/](modules/fs/README.md)). ## 3. Pre-FEC correlation run The register question is answered (post-FEC vs corrected-by-iteration histogram located); the graded-noise correlation run that verifies the expected ordering has not happened. Design and instrument: [modules/fibergaga/](modules/fibergaga/README.md). ## 4. Wiitek VCT — pursue or leave dead? No confirmed-safe path exists (every candidate lands in the µC danger window). The open decision is whether the capability is worth the NDA route or a sacrificial unit — the product doesn't need it for length ([modules/wiitek/](modules/wiitek/README.md), [modules/README.md](modules/README.md)). ## 5. Corrected-error channel under the internal temp client Every corrected-error burst observed decodes as a stale neighbor register served under a busy µC, and the firmware's internal ~3.5 s GET_CURRENT_TEMP poll — the prime suspect for the busy windows — is not silenceable through the handler (temp-warning disable leaves it running, proven on hardware — [modules/fs/](modules/fs/README.md)). The corrected channel stays untrustworthy; the remaining path is the register-docs ask (Wiitek request sent; the FS missing-chapter asks pending). ## 6. X520 bench divergences — features to restore on the product NIC Running on the X520 (BCM development) required parking product-NIC capabilities the 82599 lacks. Each stays parked only until the ConnectX-5 is in; none is a settled design change: - **Hardware timestamp hard check bypassed** (`ts.go`): `rx_filter=ALL` failure now reports yellow and continues instead of stopping the run. On the X520 that means the per-frame-stamp rate buckets never fill and the panel/console rates read zero — the measurement doctrine (exact per-frame RX stamps as a hard host requirement) is intact in the docs and must return to fatal on the product NIC. - **RX error counter set is per-driver** (`counters.go`, `nicRxStatsByDriver`): the ice set is the reference — jabber, fragments, `illegal_bytes` (64b/66b decode errors) and MAC local/remote faults have **no ixgbe ethtool equivalent**, so those signals are simply absent on the bench. The mlx5 name set needs deriving on CX-5 arrival; the "as close to BER as the link reports" counters (illegal bytes, faults) are the ones to insist on finding there. - **TX interrupt moderation** (`system.go`): ixgbe's mixed rx/tx vectors reject a tx-specific value, so `checkCoalesce` falls back to rx-shared-with-tx on EINVAL. Generic and self-reporting, but verify the product NIC takes the full rx+tx pair (the fallback must never fire there). - **`testDriver` still names "ice"** (`main.go`): the default pair discovery has no working target — bench runs pass `-a`/`-b` explicitly. Point it at the product driver (mlx5_core) when the CX-5 lands. - **Module I2C transport is ixgbe-only** (`phy.go`, `openBCM`): the sff_i2c debugfs path. The CX-5 needs the MCIA answer (question 1) and a second transport arm.